I did a little late afternoon e-shopping today.
Picked up this kicking pair of flats from J. Crew to feed into my new obsession with anything-but-black shoes.
Oh, and to the ridiculous chatter on the Washington Post fashion discussion today, I absolutely do not plan on matching them to my purse, so deal with it.
In fact, I bought these just to spite you.
Well, also because I don't have a green bag.
photo courtesy of jcrew.com
3 comments:
I'll probably go to #$%^ for saying this, but that chatter seemed about 300 years too old to be participating in an online chat. I thought we'd gotten over the matchy-matchiness.
Target.com has both shoes organized by color (ex. http://www.target.com/gp/browse.html/ref=sc_iw_r_2_0/601-6652323-7384112?node=13848781) and shoes 75% off (winter, but we can stock up now! (http://www.target.com/gp/browse.html/ref=sc_fe_l_4_1041816_9/601-6652323-7384112?ie=UTF8&node=169080011)
However, I have a question- or a discussion item for everyone, rather:
How much do you relax your personal office dress code in the obnoxious heat & humidity while still looking professional-conservative? What are the boundaries?
Anyway, the new issue of Harper's Bazaar says matching your purse to your shoes is soooo passé -- the new thing, apparently, is to match your purse to your clothes.
I mean, if you like paying attention to those kinds of approved-by-the-fashion-Gods rules.
Post a Comment